The
Bourne Legacy
Re-Bourne? Bourne Again? Natural Bourne Thriller? Bourne Free?
How many crappy puns can you think of with Bourne in the title? Was one of them Bourne to be…Mild?
When
star Matt Damon and director Paul Greengrass decided not to do a fourth Bourne movie
that could’ve (should’ve?) been the end of it. After all, how many more times could Matt Damon wander
through a film saying “I don’t remember,” with a blank look on his face while
snapping baddies’ necks? Also,
after using pencils, magazines and books in the last couple of films, they were
running out of ordinary, harmless, household objects for Damon to kill people
with. What would’ve been
next? The contents of a Kinder
egg? Anxious to keep their
lucrative franchise alive however, Universal tasked writer Tony Gilroy with retooling the
series. Rather than simply recast
the role (a la Bond), they’ve decided to hedge their bets and The Bourne
Legacy
introduces a new hero, Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner), draws on the events of the
previous films, weaving strands of The Bourne Ultimatum through the narrative while
leaving the door open for Damon to return in possible future installments. It’s a bold gamble that almost pays
off.
As
Jason Bourne fights for his freedom and his memory in a parallel world,
creating a media stink and exposing the CIA’s dodgy dealings, shadowy
government spooks Eric Byer (Edward Norton) and Mark Turso (Stacy Keach) start covering up the even
more super-secret programmes the people can’t know about, tying up loose ends
and destroying evidence – by eliminating all the participants! When pill-popping, chemically enhanced
super spy/assassin Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) escapes the creative death they’ve
arranged for him, he’s forced to join forces with fellow target Dr Marta
Shearing (Rachel Weisz) who can get him the superdrugs he needs to keep him alive. Cue lots of snappy neck fight scenes,
frantic chases and some globetrotting as Cross and Shearing try to stay alive
and figure out what the hell is going on?
With
its corkscrew-twisty plot and furious action scenes, on paper The Bourne
Legacy has
all the ingredients that made the other films in the franchise such superior
action-thrillers except one: it lacks heart. Without Damon the film is soulless. Renner is a fantastic actor and brings
a warmth and laconic cool to his role but Cross lacks ambiguity and is a little
too simple (literally) a character to fully engage with. Damon’s Bourne was a man in search of
himself, trying to live with and atone for past sins. The chemically enhanced Cross on the other hand is just
worried that without the smart pills he’s been taking he’ll revert to being the
stoopid cannon fodder grunt he was before he joined the programme and became
superman. He’s Charly with the
ability to kick your arse.
Similarly, Rachel Weisz just isn’t as sympathetic a heroine as Franka
Potente and Julia
Stiles were
in the previous films. Potente’s
Marie was an innocent caught up in events; collateral damage. Stiles’ Nicky was a low-level spook in
over her head. Weisz’s Shearer is
a scientist knowingly involved in experimenting on human beings to create an
army of super-assassins. She’s
basically Dr Mengele with a nice rack.
These aren’t characters seeking to redeem themselves or expose wrongdoing;
they’re just trying to stay alive and, frankly, we’ve come to expect more from
the Bourne movies. Also, I’m no
scientist like Rachel Weisz (and obviously neither is Tony Gilroy) but creating
supermen through chromosome alteration? Really? That’s what we’re going with?
Shorn
of Greengrass’ sociopolitical agenda and kinetic sensibility, The Bourne
Legacy feels
plodding. It’s fun, the breathless
action scenes are intense but it does drag a bit and it’s impossible to shake
the feeling of déjà vu. There’s
only so many terse conversations between stern spooks in wood-paneled offices
you can watch before they all blend into one and that climactic chase across
the rooftops of Manila feels awfully like Ultimatum’s chase across the rooftops
of Tangier. Just not as
exciting. At 2 hours and 15
minutes it‘s at least 20 minutes too long and lacks the urgency of the previous
entries. It also lacks an ending. Nothing is resolved. The film simply stops dead, leaving the
way open for a sequel.
Writer/director
Gilroy has said that he approached this sequel as a math problem and there lies
the problem. The film feels like
it was assembled, precision tooled to go from A to B, to bridge the gap from
The Bourne Ultimatum to future installments. When grey backroom baddie Edward Norton tells Cross “We are
morally indefensible and absolutely necessary,” you can’t help but wonder if
he’s talking about the shadowy Outcome programme or the film itself. The Bourne Legacy is a necessary evil.
David Watson
Directed
by:
Written
by:
Produced
by:
Starring:
Jeremy
Renner,
Rachel
Weisz,
Edward
Norton,
Albert
Finney,
Oscar
Isaac,
Joan
Allen,
Stacy
Keach
and Paddy
Considine
Genre:
Action
Language:
English
Runtime:
2
hours 15 minutes
Certificate:
12a
Rating:
3/5
UK
Release Date:
13th
August 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment